The Trump administration is now acting to eliminate even the pretense of concern with impacts on human health. In effect, ...
The Trump administration plans to stop assigning value to human life when analyzing the costs and benefits of air pollution ...
The EPA won't consider the economic costs of harms to human health, at least for now. Legal and health experts are concerned ...
New Studies Highlight, the Negative Effect of Pollution, on Brain Health. 'The New York Times' reports that working out in ...
4don MSNOpinion
Trump’s EPA is setting the value of human health to $0
Under the Biden administration, the EPA found that enforcing the more stringent PM2.5 regulations it issued in 2024 would add ...
The agency is abandoning a longstanding policy to calculate the monetary savings in avoided deaths and disease from cutting ...
The Environmental Protection Agency plans on only considering the industrial cost of air pollution, not the human cost, when ...
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 99% of the global population breathes air that exceeds recommended pollution limits, contributing to over 7 million premature deaths ...
The EPA “is still considering the impacts that PM2.5 and ozone emissions have on human health, but the agency will not be ...
In a reversal, the agency plans to calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, and not the monetary ...
MACH Engineering reports that industrial air pollution harms economies by increasing healthcare costs and reducing ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results